Sprint 2 - CSP Objectives
Student Teach and Software Development Objectives for Sprint 2
Issues
Teacher and Peer evaluation are critical to our success and improvements. Be sure to support meeting objectives by providing feedback and acting on feedback received.
Student Teaching - Part 1 Fundamentals
Students will engage in lesson preparation, teaching, and grading. This activity is often called “Team Teach”. The process and purpose are as follows:
- Learn Big Idea 3 from the College Board.
- Build a lesson using Python and JavaScript for each of the programming fundamentals provided by the teacher’s starters.
- The lesson should include a Tech Talk portion, popcorn hacks, and homework hacks. The lesson should NOT have more than 5 minutes of talking before engaging students in an activity (e.g., popcorn hacks).
- Be prepared to grade homework. This means having a plan for homework and a plan for grading the homework. You will grade on a “1-point” scale. Weight popcorn hacks and homework hacks in the grading.
- Lesson time will be between 20 and 30 minutes. Homework time should be about the same as lesson time.
Lesson Building (Mr M, Mr B reviews on Intro Utterances)
Grading Guideline
- 55% is minimum per item
- 75% is mostly done
- 85% is complete
- 90% is maximum perfection
Raw Form
| **Assignment** | **Points** | **Grade** | **Evidence** |
|----------------------------|---------------|-----------|--------------|
| Baseline Grade | 55% | | |
| Max Grade | 90% | | |
| Pull Request (Integration) | 1 | | |
| Relevancy Checklist (Peer) | 2 | | |
| Lesson Style (Period) | 1 | | |
| Homework, Popcorn Hacks | 1 x 5 | | |
| Individual Contribution | 1 | | |
| Personal Notebooks / Blogs | 1 | | |
| Total | 11 | | |
| **Skill** | **Points** | **Grade** | **Evidence** |
|----------------------------|---------------|-----------|--------------|
| Work Habits (Analytics) | 1 | | |
| Team Planning (Issue) | 1 | | |
| Presentation Memories | 1 | | |
| Grading and Feedback | 1 | | |
| Beyond Perfunctory | 1 | | |
Lesson Review - Topic Relevancy (Stdent Review)
Peer review checklist. Guideance
-
Scurm Master should coordinate.
-
Peer grading should be coordinated in Slack, if there are any issues.
-
Lesson providers will receive reviews from a peers in another class, doing the same topic, by enabling Utterances on your topic(s).
-
Peer graders will grade on Utterances. Be sure two people provide a review to every section of lesson (ie 2 reviews on intro, 2 reviews on .1, 2 reviews on .2, …).
-
Assingments are to review corresponding topics in other classes.
- P1 reviews P2
- P2 reviews P3
- P3 reviews P4
- P4 reviews P5
- P5 reviews P1
Note 1. The purpose is NOT MORPH lessons to be the same, boring!!! Note 2. Student reviewers will be evaluated on how and if you perform a review Note 3. Student lesson providers will be evaluated if the improve lesson based off of feedback. Remebmer/document your changes
Relevancy Checklist
| Assignment | Weightage | Grade | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| College Board Coverage | 20 | TBD | TBD |
| Python Examples | 15 | TBD | TBD |
| JavaScript Examples | 15 | TBD | TBD |
| Popcorn Hack Usage | 10 | TBD | TBD |
| Homework | 10 | TBD | TBD |
| Grading Plan | 10 | TBD | TBD |
| Original an Creative | 10 | TBD | TBD |
| Total | 90 |
Raw Form
| **Assignment** | **Weightage** | **Grade** | **Comments** |
|-------------------------|---------------|-----------|--------------|
| College Board Coverage | 20 | TBD | TBD |
| Python Examples | 15 | TBD | TBD |
| JavaScript Examples | 15 | TBD | TBD |
| Popcorn Hack Usage | 10 | TBD | TBD |
| Homework | 10 | TBD | TBD |
| Grading Plan | 10 | TBD | TBD |
| Original an Creative | 10 | TBD | TBD |
| **Total** | **90** | | |